That's just like... the rules of feminism

So, despite the fact that I predict it will make me obscenely angry / then depressed / then feel incredibly fat and inferior because i don't look like a bratz doll / then angry again, i am planning to watch Friends with Benefits tonight 

(I feel obliged to stipulate that this is NOT an activity in itself, i just plan to put it on while i get on with some wee jobs.) 

I envisage that the end bit where they inevitably ruin everything fall in love and become disgusting saps will besmirch the whole thing, 

but i’ve seen some ace quotes from it, i.e:

and:

"I really have to stop buying into this bullshit Hollywood cliche of true love. Shut up, Katherine Heigl, you stupid, little liar!"

lol.

Anyway anything that allows me to watch Mila Kunis dry humping in fleshies in a film studio for 2 hours 

(unfortunately with some squirrel that used to be in N'sync -i will be covering his face with my thumb throughout any porno parts) 

is fine bah me. 

ah Mila. with her lovely hair and face. *sigh*

anyway, i was wondering, why is it that women in films that Don't Need Men are always characterised as: 

• ball-breaker due to screwed up past who eventually comes to her senses and gets herself a ring on it

•  Careerist with emotionally screwed up past - who finally comes to her senses.... etc.

• 'ugly girls' who 'come to their senses' when they 'get pretty'

• unhinged

I prefer this girl:

in 27 dresses. (yes i have seen it. THE SHAME)

"Hey, do you want to come over to my place before the party? Some of the guys from shipping are coming, and they're bringing tequila and bubble wrap."

"Are you kidding? The only reason to wear this monstrous dress is that so some drunken groomsman can rip it to shreds with his teeth."

Jane: "George appreciates me for who I am! "
Casey: "What good is it being appreciated if no one is naked?"

yes. yes. and yes.